Posts Tagged ‘Earth’
» posted on Wednesday, September 2nd, 2009 at 3:24 pm by Jeremy Herrera
So if this Massachusetts bill passes, forget that the Constitution as a number of amendments out of the first ten, yes the Bill of Rights, that says the federal and state governments can not hold people without Due Process of the law, arrest without cause, enter a person’s house without a warrant and so on.
Let break this down by amendments…
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
So in the first amendment this bill would break the free of religion as not every religion believes in medical treatment. So if you are one of the many that from a religious background do not believe in receiving advanced medical treatment or medical treatment in general, you going to be locked up and fined until you conform into a good child of the state.
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
So, under the forth amendment you are protected from forced entry by any governmental agent from searching, entering, or seizure of your house, person, papers, and effects. So how on earth do the great lawmaker figure they can create a law that allows forced quarantine and vaccination of any person in any state? Oh sure they will say they have probably cause due to the health of the community surrounding the person. But lets be honest here, when our Constitution was created the idea of a vaccination was not even invented yet and if it were they would have placed that in the amendment also.
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.
Oh no not the Due Process Amendment!! Yep, the fifth amendment is the location of the strongest reasons for the bill to be ruled un-Constitutional. So are we going to start to see false grand juries opening up to indict people who refuse to the bill? That would be the only way for the bill to be enforced. Without a false or I will say un-American grand jury this bill would never legally be allowed to imprison or force quarantine or vaccinate any person in these United States.
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.
The sixth amendment is where they must provide for a speed and public trial. If I were one of those that were arrested and brought to trail I would bet your bottom dollar that I would have each and every lawmaker that created this bill be a witness. I would do this for two reasons… 1. They created the law and I would want to have them answer questions as to the medical knowledge that lead them to create the bill. 2. Ensure that if they refuse to be on the witness stand because they were that freaking afraid of the H1N1 virus that I would have to be let go do to an unfair trial that did not allow me to confront the witnesses that placed me in jail.
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.
The eighth amendment is the last one that would be broken if this bill became law. I believe this to be true doe to the one fact that they would be allowed to hold a person in excess of bail and with excessive fines for their form of the pursuit of happiness.
So, who the hell are these Massachusetts’ law makers that think they should be allowed to break your Constitutional Rights and not even bat an eye?
post a comment | filed under Obama the King | tags: congressional candidate, Constitutional Boundaries, Earth, EVEN, Floor Action, Freedom Works, Funny Part, Letter, Medical Advice, Mid 70s, Rabble, Reality Check, Revolts, Riot Gear, Services Photo, socialist country, statue, Texas Government, Virginia State, War Effort